Nerdy News Blog From A Geek To Go!

Striving to deliver a daily dose of the techie trials and tribulations on a 'Need 2 kn0w' basis. U kn0w wh0 u r!

Sunday, May 31, 2009

AOL and Time Warner: A Sympathy Note

and that stupid merger cost me my job at CNN, thus turning me into A Geek To Go!-Miles West

Jeff Bertolucci

May 29, 2009 12:54 pm

aol time warner

Graphic: Diego Aguirre
I feel sorry for AOL, as strange as that sounds. The former ISP kingpin, which had the audacity to buy mighty Time Warner at the height of the Internet bubble in 2000 (ah, the ludicrously inflated market values of those halcyon days), will soon be spun off as a separate company. In other words, Time Warner, which stripped "AOL" from its corporate name years ago, is dumping its former partner.

"We believe AOL will then have a better opportunity to achieve its full potential as a leading independent Internet company," said Time Warner CEO Jeff Bewkes in a statement.

That's always what people say in a divorce. Better opportunity is code for don't let the door hit you on the way out.

Full potential? While I wouldn't say that Time Warner expects AOL to wither away and die, it sure looks that way. A quick look at AOL's prospects makes it clear why Time Warner has decided to move on.

aol time warnerWhile AOL remains a major Internet service provider with about 6.3 million subscribers, it has been letting that business waste away for years. It's hard to believe that, at its peak, AOL claimed as many as 34 million subscribers. But it lacked the infrastructure and management savvy to transition from dial up to broadband, and its ISP business remained stuck in the 90s. Today, AOL's primarily income source is its declining online advertising generated by its eclectic mix of content sites, including the AOL.com portal, gossip site TMZ.com, and MapQuest. There's a business model there, certainly, but AOL is small potatoes compared to competitors Google, Yahoo, and Microsoft -- not the Internet behemoth Time Warner wants it to be. (For a refresher, check out "20 Years of AOL Annoyances and Foul-Ups.")

AOL will solder on, but I doubt it'll ever reclaim its past glory -- or notoriety, depending on your point of view. The company formerly known as America Online was once The Great Satan to tech sophisticates. PC World contributor Dan Tynan efficiently summarized AOL's sins in his 2006 article, "The 25 Worst Tech Products of All Time:"

"How do we loathe AOL? Let us count the ways. Since America Online emerged from the belly of a BBS called Quantum "PC-Link" in 1989, users have suffered through awful software, inaccessible dial-up numbers, rapacious marketing, in-your-face advertising, questionable billing practices, inexcusably poor customer service, and enough spam to last a lifetime. And all the while, AOL remained more expensive than its major competitors. This lethal combination earned the world's biggest ISP the top spot on our list of bottom feeders."

Yes, everything Dan wrote was true. So why do I feel sorry for AOL? Perhaps because its Time Warner split represents an end of an era. Then again, maybe not. Honestly, I'm not sure.

In the tech universe of the 90s, AOL users were the real nerds. Clueless newbies who needed the Internet with training wheels. An AOL e-mail address was the very definition of uncool.

I had an AOL e-mail address.

During those years I wrote a monthly Windows column for a now-defunct magazine called Computer Currents. My editor Robert Luhn, another AOL user, once wrote -- and I'm paraphrasing here -- that the main reason he kept his AOL e-mail account was because it pissed off the Internet snobs. I thought that was hilarious. It summed up my philosophy too.

There were times I'd be interviewing Web gurus who'd ask for my e-mail address. When I'd say, "aol.com," I'd often hear a snarky comment or a moment of stunned silence. One guy blurted out: "Oh, you (AOL) people are scum, JUST SCUM!"

He was joking, sort of.

I still use my AOL e-mail address, but the snarky comments ended years ago. Nobody cares about AOL anymore. The company may still be a viable business, but it has lost its power to influence or enrage.

The good news? Fewer CD-ROMs in landfills.

Friday, May 29, 2009

Microsoft Bing a Good Start, but No Game Changer

Microsoft Bing a Good Start, but No Game Changer

Elizabeth Montalbano, IDG News Service

May 28, 2009 6:20 pm

Microsoft's new search engine, Bing, will help the company gain some search share against Google and has features that users will find helpful, but it is in no way a quick fix for the company's poor position in the search market, analysts said.

As expected, on Thursday Microsoft revealed a rebranded and expanded search engine, which it's promoting as a "decision engine" aimed at helping people better organize search information and find what they're looking for more quickly. The news came after months of speculation about what Microsoft would call its next iteration of Live Search and what new features it would have.

To help users find information more quickly, Bing's algorithm ranks search results based on how relevant they were for other users. The interface also organizes results according to subcategories, depending on the search term, so that people can find the next likely piece of information they may be looking for quickly.

While some of these features deliver better search results than Google's in a side-by-side comparison, it's not a drastic enough change to make people migrate in droves, said Greg Sterling, a search analyst with Sterling Market Intelligence.

"It's a strong first step or a new salvo for them, but it's not going to dramatically alter the market as it stands today," and Microsoft recognizes this, he said. "Microsoft doesn't see this as the end of the process; they see this as a new beginning. I think there are interesting things they can do to continue to advance the features."

Sterling said Bing may not pull much share from Google, but it could lure users away from the search engines of AOL, Ask.com and possibly Yahoo, though Microsoft is still rumored to be close to some kind of search deal with Yahoo, which of course would change the competitive landscape.

Gartner Group analyst Allen Weiner agreed that Bing isn't presenting a radical new way to search the Web. "I don't see anything that you can say, wow, I can't do this on Google or Yahoo," he said.

For example, three areas that Weiner thinks represent the future of search -- data visualization, semantic search and rich media search -- are missing from Bing as it was introduced on Thursday. None of the other major search-engine companies have been able to tackle these areas either, but they are heading in that direction.

However, what Bing does provide Microsoft is a way to catch up to what competitors have now in terms of features, Weiner said.

"It's a marked improvement from Live Search," he said. "They've done a lot to make the interface more usable, to make it cleaner-looking -- a lot with the algorithms to make the search results on par with their competitors for most searches."

The name, which has been the subject of much debate, also differentiates the brand for Microsoft. One insider said Microsoft chose the name because "bing" represents the sound made when a person finds something they're looking for.

During an appearance at the D7 conference, where Microsoft unveiled Bing, Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer said the name was chosen because it was short, worked for a global audience and didn't have any negative connotations

No matter what the reasons, Weiner said that with Bing Microsoft has a brand -- unlike its previous MSN or Live Search brands -- "that is marketable and quick off the tongue" and easily identifiable, but not tied to the Microsoft brand.

"They've carved out a niche for themselves like they did with Xbox," he said.

It remains to be seen how well Bing fares after its official debut next Wednesday. In the meantime, Google not only continues to add features to its own search engine but also is launching new online applications. On Thursday, the company revealed an ambitious product called Wave that combines e-mail, IM, blogging, photo management, wikis and document sharing.

"Google continues to remind the world they are spending lots of money and time in dictating the future of search," Sterling said. "They are not standing still by any stretch of the imagination."

Thursday, May 28, 2009

STILL TRUST AOL?

Time Warner Board Approves AOL Spinoff; Dial-Up Business To Remain With AOL

By David Kaplan - Thu 28 May 2009 05:36 AM PST

As expected, Time Warner (NYSE: TWX) (NYSE:TWX) confirmed that its board of directors has authorized the spinoff of AOL—making the internet unit an independent, publicly traded company following the proposed transaction. And, as we reported would be the case, AOL will keep the online-access subscription service.

Time Warner hopes to conclude the spinoff, which requires an SEC review, by the end of the year. The company also expects to buy back Google’s 5 percent stake as part of completing this transaction but there is no confirmation that Google (NSDQ: GOOG) has agree to the terms or whether a agreed-upon valuation has taken place. The news sent Time Warner stock up slightly higher in pre-market trading.

Time Warner Chairman and CEO Jeff Bewkes said: “We believe that a separation will be the best outcome for both Time Warner and AOL. The separation will be another critical step in the reshaping of Time Warner that we started at the beginning of last year, enabling us to focus to an even greater degree on our core content businesses.” More from TW in the release and later this morning during the company’s annual meeting.

The move takes place at the roughly the midway point of new Chairman and CEO Tim Armstrong’s “100 days” plan to assess AOL. Over the past few weeks, Armstrong has made some key personnel moves, including forcing Greg Coleman out as head of advertising, replacing him with his former Google colleague Jeff Levick in the broader role of head of AOL’ global advertising. And this past week, Bebo’s Joanna Shields stepped down as president of AOL’s People Network, following clear signals that her role and resources were to be diminished..

All of this will pave the way for a tighter, more integrated AOL. Under former CEO Randy Falco and COO Ron Grant, AOL had been separated into three distinct units: MediaGlow programming; People Networks, which in addition to Bebo, includes the instant messaging service AIM; and the once robust Platform-A advertising unit, which has fallen on hard times with the decline of display advertising. AllThingsD’s Kara Swisher reports that only MediaGlow will keep its autonomy, with Bill Wilson remaining as president.

Swisher also reports that Bebo and other acquisitions including Truveo and Userplane will be placed in AOL Ventures, with AOL trying to get venture capital investments for them. How Bebo will be carved out after a year of integration is unclear.

Wednesday, May 27, 2009

Why Google faces antitrust scrutiny.

We all know how an auction works. The auctioneer sits up front and keeps calling for higher bids until there's one bidder left—and that person wins. Now imagine an auction where the auctioneer won't let you see the other bidders, but assures you they are there, on the other side of a curtain. The auctioneer won't tell you who the other bidders are; you're only told a range of prices that others have bid. And there's another twist: simply paying the most doesn't guarantee you'll win, because the auctioneer has created a system that lets some bidders win even when they pay less. You may not like this system, but you must participate because this auctioneer controls the bulk of the market.

Imagine that, and you have imagined Google. Most people think of Google as a free search engine—and it is that. But the real genius of Google was that it figured out that advertisers would pay to have their messages pop up when someone types in a keyword. For instance, a hotel chain might pay to show ads to anyone who types in "hotel in Phoenix." Those search ads now represent the biggest chunk of all Internet advertising. Google gets the lion's share, which has allowed it to amass such power that it may end up the target of a federal antitrust investigation.

TECHNOLOGY
How Well Do You Know Google?

Can you pass this trivia test—without looking up the answers on you-know-what?

The Feds are already sniffing around. The Department of Justice is examining possible antitrust issues in a deal Google has reached with authors to sell millions of books online. The Federal Trade Commission is investigating issues connected to the fact that Google and Apple share two board members, one of whom is Google CEO Eric Schmidt. Last year, when Google tried to make a search pact with Yahoo, federal regulators came close to bringing antitrust charges until Google walked away from the deal. Microsoft, a bitter rival, is pushing regulators to rein in Google—and it may or may not be a coincidence that one of Microsoft's outside law firms also represents TradeComet, a tiny New York company that in February sued Google, alleging antitrust violations. (Microsoft says it has nothing to do with that litigation.) Finally, the new head of antitrust enforcement in the Obama administration, Christine Varney, has vowed to take a tougher stance on antitrust than the Bush administration did. Last summer, speaking at a conference, Varney expressed concerns that Google had acquired a monopoly in Internet advertising.

Why all the fuss? Two thirds of all U.S. Internet searches take place on Google, while its nearest rivals, Yahoo and Microsoft, handle 20 percent and 8 percent, respectively, according to researcher eMarketer. If you hope to sell products over the Internet, you pretty much have to advertise on Google. To get placed at the top of the list of search results, you must outbid other advertisers. Google tells you only the range of prices others are willing to pay. And Google assigns each advertiser a "quality score," based on the relevancy of its ad. If Google deems your ad to be relevant, you pay less for the keyword than a bidder whose ad Google considers not very relevant. The idea, Google says, is to keep spammers from winning keyword bids and pulling users off to junky Web sites. (Yahoo and Microsoft assign quality scores too. The only difference is that Google has more market clout.) Google won't disclose the formulas it uses to assign quality scores, saying this would let spammers game the system. But who knows? You could be getting ripped off. An extra penny here and there could be worth millions to Google.

Google, of course, is the "Don't be evil" company, and it swears that it is operating in good faith. "We understand that as we get larger and more successful, there's going to be more scrutiny and more questions," says Adam Kovacevich, a Google spokesman. "[But] we think we have a good story to tell—we've done a lot to promote competition online."

Tuesday, May 26, 2009

Microsoft sets July kill date for Office 2000

Don't forget, there's always free OpenOffice as an alternative!

Ends all support for buggy suite; also dumps Office Update site

By Gregg Keizer , Computerworld , 05/21/2009

Microsoft yesterday reminded Office 2000 users that it will discontinue security updates for the aged suite in less than two months as it drops all support for the software.

At the same time, the company also reminded users that it's dumping the Office Update site at the end of July, part of an effort to streamline update options.

Office 2000 falls off the support list on July 14 -- which is also Microsoft's "Patch Tuesday" for that month -- as it leaves what the company calls "extended" support. From that point on, Microsoft will no issue fixes, not even ones for critical vulnerabilities; instead, it expects users to move on to a newer suite.

By policy, Microsoft supports business software such as Office for a total of 10 years, half in "mainstream" support and the second half in the more limited support. Security updates are delivered for the entire 10-year stretch.

Microsoft launched Office 2000 in June 1999.

Office Update, which debuted alongside Office 2000, will also be killed, Microsoft said. "Starting August 1, 2009, Microsoft will discontinue support for the Office Update website," the company said in an entry to an Office engineering blog.

Users who have been using Office Update to grab patches will be redirected to the newer Microsoft Update site starting Aug. 1. "This move will allow us to provide a more simplified and consistent experience for users across Microsoft products," the blog post read.

Although Microsoft didn't say so, Office Update was unnecessary once it stopped supporting Office 2000, which was the only suite unable to use the Microsoft Update alternative.

Also getting the boot is the Office Inventory Tool, an enterprise management tool that lets IT administrators check Office 2000, Office XP, and Office 2003 patch status on machines remotely. Microsoft urged system administrators still wedded to Office Inventory to switch to Windows Server Update Services (WSUS).

Microsoft may be dropping patch support for Office 2000, but that doesn't mean hackers won't be uncovering new vulnerabilities or using them to hijack machines. In fact, Office 2000 has been patched 15 times so far this year alone, 12 of which were labeled "critical," Microsoft's most serious threat ranking.

Just last week, Microsoft patched 10 bugs in PowerPoint 2000, the presentation maker in Office 2000.

Microsoft is currently working on Office 2010, but has not nailed down a ship date. Some users, however, will begin testing Office 2010 in July, the same month Office 2000 gets its death certificate.

Klingon Anti-virus Available for Download. Really.

Klingon Anti-virus Available for Download. Really.

Erik Larkin

They walk the warrior's path and they devour horrible-looking bowlfuls of red worms, but hey, Klingons need malware protection too.

To help Worf and his compatriots in their trek for PC security, anti-virus maker Sophos has translated one of their tools into Klingon. Yes, really. It's now available as a free download from http://www.sophos.com/klingon-anti-virus/.

Sophos' Graham Cluely says the app is a working, translated version of Sophos' Threat Detection Test, which is not the full Sophos antivirus product, but can run an on-demand virus scan alongside your existing antivirus protection. The app (both the translated and English versions) isn't meant to replace AV, but to instead provide an additional scan to see if your current program has missed anything.

In an explanatory post, the company says it was actually asked by a (hot-blooded and prone to violence?) potential customer whether the software could be translated, and that it got help from a member of the Klingon Language Institute named naHQun in creating the translation.

As publicity stunts go, I have to say this is a fun one. I'd wonder if a Vulcan version was coming next, but maybe the pointy-ears are too logical to fall for the "Britney Spears Naked!!!" e-mails and don't need it. And if all this Star Trek-talk has you jonesing for more, take a look at "Star Trek Gear Fit for a Trekkie Lifestyle" and a new Star Trek iPhone game.

Thursday, May 21, 2009

Source: Office Depot Associates Routinely Lie about Notebook Stock

From LAPTOPMAG.com
March 10th, 2009 by Avram Piltch

od-exterior-iTimes are tough—apparently so tough that some associates at Office Depot are willing to turn notebook customers away if they aren’t spending enough on extras. According to several LAPTOP readers, including a current Office Depot employee we interviewed, the retailer’s sales staff are under such intense pressure to sell such “attachments” as Product Protection Plans and Tech Depot Services, that many will tell customers who turn down these services that the computer they asked for is not in stock, even when it’s sitting right in the stock room.

We first became aware of this problem a few weeks ago, when we went to our local Office Depot, looking for a Gateway LT1004U netbook. We were surprised by how aggressively the sales associate tried to convince us not to buy the system and then, when we said we still wanted it, how aggressively he tried to convince us to buy its corresponding tech services. When we posted about our experience on the LAPTOP blog, some surprising comments starting coming in from several different readers claiming to work for Office Depot.

Readers Raise the Alarm

“Not only do [we] sales people depend on the extra cash we earn from add-ons, if we do not sell them and make a quota, we get the shaft from our bosses and their bosses and their bosses,” reader Chris H. wrote.

A reader going by the moniker Office Depot Employee was more direct. This commenter wrote, “At store level, OD puts too much pressure on sales consultants and managers to sell the PPPs (Product Protection Plans) & TDS (Tech Depot Services). I know of several stores in my market that will ‘feel out’ the customer to see if they are the type to purchase these services. If the customer lets on that they only want the computer and no services … then that store simply claims to be out of stock! We are required to sell 30% + on both of these services or we get PIP’d (Performance Improvement Process) (or Written up) and get ultimately fired.”

Another reader using the alias OD tech sales Manager wrote, “Unfortunately, what you all have been commenting is very close to the truth of the matter. But not all Office Depots practice this unethical decision making … I don’t hesitate from selling my laptops even though they deny wanting these services. Why? Because like you said before. (sic) the quota is 30% so I can lose out on 7 laptops but get 3 and be okay still.”

Current Salesperson Spills the Beans

While e-mails sent to these first three commenters went unreplied, we were able to make contact with a fourth reader named Rich (last name withheld), who was willing to talk to us and even provided us with a pay stub to prove that he currently works at an Office Depot. In an extensive phone and e-mail interview, Rich said that he was always honest with customers but had been instructed to lie about notebook stock both by one of his four store managers and by a district manager.

“I have witnessed lying about the availability of a notebook, and have been told to do so myself,” Rich told us. ” Once I was talking to the customer and, while I am actually speaking, my manager comes on the radio and tells me to say it is out of stock if they aren’t getting anything with it. I always ignore him and sell it anyway because lying to the customer is flat-out wrong.”

Sales Quotas for Associates, Percentages for Managers

Rich told us that although lying about notebook stock is not official Office Depot policy, the chain’s tough quotas lead many managers and sales associates to game the system any way they can. Rich said that store managers are held to a strict minimum “attachment rating,” which is determined through a complex formula that weighs the value of “attachments”—services such as warranties and service plans or accessories like printer cables—against the number of tech products sold.

If a store’s attachment rating falls below 30 percent, the manager could face disciplinary action from higher-ups. Sales associates like Rich, however, are not held to a percentage, but to a weekly dollar amount. Rich said his current dollar amount is $200, and if he doesn’t hit that number, he faces warnings, and then termination in short order.

“Basically they drill it in your head that if you don’t sell PPPs, you’re gonna get fired. It’s gotten so bad to the point where the managers are starting to find loopholes in the system. They would rather sell one laptop with a PPP than ten laptops with nothing. They don’t care,” he said.

Tough Weekly Goals Determine Commissions

In addition to the stick of losing their jobs, Office Depot sales associates have the carrot of commissions for themselves and all of their co-workers if the store reaches or exceeds its attachment sales numbers. According to Rich, each store has its own daily sales goal for PPPs ($200 for Rich’s store; as much as $450 for others he knows). The daily goals are determined by a number of factors, including that store’s previous performance.

At the end of each week, the commission rate for all of the store’s sales associates is determined based on where the total amount of PPP sales stands in relation to the store’s goals for that week. If the store achieved more than 120% or more of its goal, all associates get 15% commission for the previous week’s sales. If the store achieved 100 to 120%, they get 10% commission. Eighty to 99 percent nets a 5% commission for associates, while falling below 80% of the goal means that associates get no commission at all, no matter how much they sold as individuals.

“One PPP could make or break how the entire store gets paid for commission that week,” he said. “That’s why they put such an emphasis on it.”

According to Rich, the price of a PPP ranges from $100 on the low end to as much as $495 for a multiyear plan on an expensive notebook. Rich told us that Office Depot typically charges $125 for extended protection on a $300 netbook. Tech Depot Services vary widely in price. A local Office Depot associate tried to sell us software installation on an optical-driveless netbook for $30 per program, but Rich told us the most common services for notebooks are trialware removal, “optimization,” and a year of McAfee Anti-Virus. All three services combined cost $99, though trialware removal alone starts at $29.

The Tech Depot Services are an especially vibrant profit center for Office Depot, with little cost and effort involved. According to Rich, some services are performed by remote workers who do little more than push a few buttons to install software.

“The software installation the associates do. We will install everything,” Rich said. “The service where we install McAfee and get rid of all the trialware—the way it works is that we hook it up to our tech bench and a remote person will take over the computer and then they’ll basically run a little uninstall wizard that does everything for them. They’re basically just clicking a few buttons and it just does it.”

Why Associates Lie

Rich also told us that there is no commission at all just for selling a notebook without any attachments. So there’s no financial incentive for salespeople to help customers who don’t want protection plans or tech services.

Considering that the manager is held to a minimum attachment rating, but the associates are only held to a total dollar amount, we wondered why the associates would lie to customers and tell them a notebook was out of stock when it neither harms nor helps their individual stats. Rich explained that sales associates are both concerned about the store’s attachment rating and about losing the opportunity to sell each an individual laptop to a PPP or TDS-buying customer.

“Ideally, they want every single laptop to go out with a warranty, so if you sell one, that’s one opportunity that’s gone,” Rich said. “They figure if they don’t sell it, someone else will come in and get it, especially if it’s a laptop that’s in the ad that a lot of people are going to come in . . . They figure they’re going to sell it eventually. You might as well do it to someone that’s going to get something with it.”

Rich said that a typical Office Depot has at most one or two of each regular-priced notebook in stock at any given time, with a maximum of 5 units for sale circular items. He told us that employees aren’t too concerned about running out of stock, because a truck comes with new supplies at least three times a week, more frequently during peak sales times such as back-to-school.

The Scope of the Problem

Without doing a comprehensive survey of dozens or hundreds of Office Depot employees, it’s difficult to tell just how widespread the problem of lying sales associates has become. We know from our reader comments that the problem is not limited to Rich’s store alone, but we hear from Rich that not every associate lies and not every manager encourages their sales people to lie.

“As far as not-selling, I’ve heard about it from other stores. The original one [store] that I worked at, it wasn’t really too bad. They only time they told me not to sell something to someone was a customer who came in once a week and bought a computer and then returned it two days later. Other than that, that store was pretty good,” Rich recounted. “This one [the manager at his current store], his thing is to really get the warranty, to get as much as possible. He’s told me repeatedly to not sell a computer if you’re not getting anything with it.”

According to Rich, the district manager once visited his store and told all the associates to lie.

“We did get told by the district manager one time to talk to the customer, figure out what they want, do your normal sales routine, and figure out what they’re going to get,” he said. “Offer them the PPP. Offer them the TDS and then, if they’re going to get it, go check to see if we have it in stock and, if we do, bring it out to them. If they’re not going to get anything with it, just go check to see if we have it and then come back and say ‘oh, we’re out of stock on it.’”

We tried more than once to investigate this very claim by visiting a local Office Depot branch here in Manhattan, but were told that the laptop we wanted was in stock when we sent a LAPTOP staff writer undercover to purchase a notebook without any PPP or TDS plans. So either our local Office Depot is an honest branch or we got an honest sales associate.

Office Depot’s Response

We contacted Office Depot corporate and shared some of the things Rich had told us, along with our other reader’s comments. Their response in its entirety is as follows:

We certainly appreciate your bringing this situation to our attention. Our objective is to sell merchandise and to offer and recommend solutions to our customers, without regard to whether a customer purchases or does not purchase a service warranty or a software package. Office Depot has been recognized with numerous awards for our commitment to customer service, so please know that we take this issue very seriously and will take the necessary steps to ensure that we continue to enhance the customer experience and promote quality in our customer-related processes. With respect to your inquiry, we intend to look into the situation further, as part of our continuing commitment to ensuring customer satisfaction and consistent selling practices.

Update: Office Depot has issued a more detailed response.

How to Get What You Want

So what do you do if you want to buy a notebook at Office Depot, but you don’t want a protection plan or Tech Depot Services? You have a few options:

  • Be honest with the sales associate in telling them you don’t want the services and hope that they are being honest with you about the stock. There’s a good chance they are.
  • Lie to the sales associate, tell them you want an extended warranty, and then pretend to change your mind after he brings your notebook out of the back room.
  • Use the store’s own inventory computer to check stock. Rich says that there are computers throughout the store that associates use that are also meant for customer use. If you grab the merchandise ticket for the notebook you want and enter its 6-digit SKU number into the item lookup box on the inventory computer, a screen will appear that shows whether the notebook is in stock. If the number of items in stock is either 1 or 0, it’s out of stock because item #1 is the floor model. Of course, it’s always possible a sales associate could still lie to you and tell you the remaining notebooks are on hold for another customer or that the computer is wrong.